An issue that comes up rather frequently for new installations of Kubernetes is
that a Service is not working properly. You’ve run your Deployment and
created a Service, but you get no response when you try to access it.
This document will hopefully help you to figure out what’s going wrong.
Throughout this doc you will see various commands that you can run. Some
commands need to be run within a Pod, others on a Kubernetes Node, and others
can run anywhere you have kubectl and credentials for the cluster. To make it
clear what is expected, this document will use the following conventions.
If the command “COMMAND” is expected to run in a Pod and produce “OUTPUT”:
u@pod$ COMMAND
OUTPUTIf the command “COMMAND” is expected to run on a Node and produce “OUTPUT”:
u@node$ COMMAND
OUTPUTIf the command is “kubectl ARGS”:
$ kubectl ARGS
OUTPUTFor many steps here you will want to see what a Pod running in the cluster
sees. The simplest way to do this is to run an interactive busybox Pod:
$ kubectl run -it --rm --restart=Never busybox --image=busybox sh
If you don't see a command prompt, try pressing enter.
/ #If you already have a running Pod that you prefer to use, you can run a
command in it using:
$ kubectl exec <POD-NAME> -c <CONTAINER-NAME> -- <COMMAND>For the purposes of this walk-through, let’s run some Pods. Since you’re
probably debugging your own Service you can substitute your own details, or you
can follow along and get a second data point.
$ kubectl run hostnames --image=k8s.gcr.io/serve_hostname \
--labels=app=hostnames \
--port=9376 \
--replicas=3
deployment.apps/hostnames createdkubectl commands will print the type and name of the resource created or mutated, which can then be used in subsequent commands.
Note: This is the same as if you started the
Deploymentwith the following YAML:apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: hostnames spec: selector: matchLabels: app: hostnames replicas: 3 template: metadata: labels: app: hostnames spec: containers: - name: hostnames image: k8s.gcr.io/serve_hostname ports: - containerPort: 9376 protocol: TCP
Confirm your Pods are running:
$ kubectl get pods -l app=hostnames
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
hostnames-632524106-bbpiw 1/1 Running 0 2m
hostnames-632524106-ly40y 1/1 Running 0 2m
hostnames-632524106-tlaok 1/1 Running 0 2mThe astute reader will have noticed that we did not actually create a Service
yet - that is intentional. This is a step that sometimes gets forgotten, and
is the first thing to check.
So what would happen if I tried to access a non-existent Service? Assuming you
have another Pod that consumes this Service by name you would get something
like:
u@pod$ wget -qO- hostnames
wget: bad address 'hostname'So the first thing to check is whether that Service actually exists:
$ kubectl get svc hostnames
No resources found.
Error from server (NotFound): services "hostnames" not foundSo we have a culprit, let’s create the Service. As before, this is for the
walk-through - you can use your own Service’s details here.
$ kubectl expose deployment hostnames --port=80 --target-port=9376
service/hostnames exposedAnd read it back, just to be sure:
$ kubectl get svc hostnames
NAME TYPE CLUSTER-IP EXTERNAL-IP PORT(S) AGE
hostnames ClusterIP 10.0.1.175 <none> 80/TCP 5sAs before, this is the same as if you had started the Service with YAML:
apiVersion: v1
kind: Service
metadata:
name: hostnames
spec:
selector:
app: hostnames
ports:
- name: default
protocol: TCP
port: 80
targetPort: 9376Now you can confirm that the Service exists.
From a Pod in the same Namespace:
u@pod$ nslookup hostnames
Address 1: 10.0.0.10 kube-dns.kube-system.svc.cluster.local
Name: hostnames
Address 1: 10.0.1.175 hostnames.default.svc.cluster.localIf this fails, perhaps your Pod and Service are in different
Namespaces, try a namespace-qualified name:
u@pod$ nslookup hostnames.default
Address 1: 10.0.0.10 kube-dns.kube-system.svc.cluster.local
Name: hostnames.default
Address 1: 10.0.1.175 hostnames.default.svc.cluster.localIf this works, you’ll need to adjust your app to use a cross-namespace name, or
run your app and Service in the same Namespace. If this still fails, try a
fully-qualified name:
u@pod$ nslookup hostnames.default.svc.cluster.local
Address 1: 10.0.0.10 kube-dns.kube-system.svc.cluster.local
Name: hostnames.default.svc.cluster.local
Address 1: 10.0.1.175 hostnames.default.svc.cluster.localNote the suffix here: “default.svc.cluster.local”. The “default” is the
Namespace we’re operating in. The “svc” denotes that this is a Service.
The “cluster.local” is your cluster domain, which COULD be different in your
own cluster.
You can also try this from a Node in the cluster:
Note: 10.0.0.10 is my DNSService, yours might be different)
u@node$ nslookup hostnames.default.svc.cluster.local 10.0.0.10
Server: 10.0.0.10
Address: 10.0.0.10#53
Name: hostnames.default.svc.cluster.local
Address: 10.0.1.175If you are able to do a fully-qualified name lookup but not a relative one, you
need to check that your /etc/resolv.conf file is correct.
u@pod$ cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 10.0.0.10
search default.svc.cluster.local svc.cluster.local cluster.local example.com
options ndots:5The nameserver line must indicate your cluster’s DNS Service. This is
passed into kubelet with the --cluster-dns flag.
The search line must include an appropriate suffix for you to find the
Service name. In this case it is looking for Services in the local
Namespace (default.svc.cluster.local), Services in all Namespaces
(svc.cluster.local), and the cluster (cluster.local). Depending on your own
install you might have additional records after that (up to 6 total). The
cluster suffix is passed into kubelet with the --cluster-domain flag. We
assume that is “cluster.local” in this document, but yours might be different,
in which case you should change that in all of the commands above.
The options line must set ndots high enough that your DNS client library
considers search paths at all. Kubernetes sets this to 5 by default, which is
high enough to cover all of the DNS names it generates.
If the above still fails - DNS lookups are not working for your Service - we
can take a step back and see what else is not working. The Kubernetes master
Service should always work:
u@pod$ nslookup kubernetes.default
Server: 10.0.0.10
Address 1: 10.0.0.10 kube-dns.kube-system.svc.cluster.local
Name: kubernetes.default
Address 1: 10.0.0.1 kubernetes.default.svc.cluster.localIf this fails, you might need to go to the kube-proxy section of this doc, or
even go back to the top of this document and start over, but instead of
debugging your own Service, debug DNS.
Assuming we can confirm that DNS works, the next thing to test is whether your
Service works at all. From a node in your cluster, access the Service’s
IP (from kubectl get above).
u@node$ curl 10.0.1.175:80
hostnames-0uton
u@node$ curl 10.0.1.175:80
hostnames-yp2kp
u@node$ curl 10.0.1.175:80
hostnames-bvc05If your Service is working, you should get correct responses. If not, there
are a number of things that could be going wrong. Read on.
It might sound silly, but you should really double and triple check that your
Service is correct and matches your Pod’s port. Read back your Service
and verify it:
$ kubectl get service hostnames -o json{
"kind": "Service",
"apiVersion": "v1",
"metadata": {
"name": "hostnames",
"namespace": "default",
"selfLink": "/api/v1/namespaces/default/services/hostnames",
"uid": "428c8b6c-24bc-11e5-936d-42010af0a9bc",
"resourceVersion": "347189",
"creationTimestamp": "2015-07-07T15:24:29Z",
"labels": {
"app": "hostnames"
}
},
"spec": {
"ports": [
{
"name": "default",
"protocol": "TCP",
"port": 80,
"targetPort": 9376,
"nodePort": 0
}
],
"selector": {
"app": "hostnames"
},
"clusterIP": "10.0.1.175",
"type": "ClusterIP",
"sessionAffinity": "None"
},
"status": {
"loadBalancer": {}
}
}Is the port you are trying to access in spec.ports[]? Is the targetPort
correct for your Pods (many Pods choose to use a different port than the
Service)? If you meant it to be a numeric port, is it a number (9376) or a
string “9376”? If you meant it to be a named port, do your Pods expose a port
with the same name? Is the port’s protocol the same as the Pod’s?
If you got this far, we assume that you have confirmed that your Service
exists and is resolved by DNS. Now let’s check that the Pods you ran are
actually being selected by the Service.
Earlier we saw that the Pods were running. We can re-check that:
$ kubectl get pods -l app=hostnames
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
hostnames-0uton 1/1 Running 0 1h
hostnames-bvc05 1/1 Running 0 1h
hostnames-yp2kp 1/1 Running 0 1hThe “AGE” column says that these Pods are about an hour old, which implies that
they are running fine and not crashing.
The -l app=hostnames argument is a label selector - just like our Service
has. Inside the Kubernetes system is a control loop which evaluates the
selector of every Service and saves the results into an Endpoints object.
$ kubectl get endpoints hostnames
NAME ENDPOINTS
hostnames 10.244.0.5:9376,10.244.0.6:9376,10.244.0.7:9376This confirms that the endpoints controller has found the correct Pods for
your Service. If the hostnames row is blank, you should check that the
spec.selector field of your Service actually selects for metadata.labels
values on your Pods. A common mistake is to have a typo or other error, such
as the Service selecting for run=hostnames, but the Deployment specifying
app=hostnames.
At this point, we know that your Service exists and has selected your Pods.
Let’s check that the Pods are actually working - we can bypass the Service
mechanism and go straight to the Pods.
Note: These commands use thePodport (9376), rather than theServiceport (80).
u@pod$ wget -qO- 10.244.0.5:9376
hostnames-0uton
pod $ wget -qO- 10.244.0.6:9376
hostnames-bvc05
u@pod$ wget -qO- 10.244.0.7:9376
hostnames-yp2kpWe expect each Pod in the Endpoints list to return its own hostname. If
this is not what happens (or whatever the correct behavior is for your own
Pods), you should investigate what’s happening there. You might find
kubectl logs to be useful or kubectl exec directly to your Pods and check
service from there.
Another thing to check is that your Pods are not crashing or being restarted.
Frequent restarts could lead to intermittent connectivity issues.
$ kubectl get pods -l app=hostnames
NAME READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE
hostnames-632524106-bbpiw 1/1 Running 0 2m
hostnames-632524106-ly40y 1/1 Running 0 2m
hostnames-632524106-tlaok 1/1 Running 0 2mIf the restart count is high, read more about how to debug pods.
If you get here, your Service is running, has Endpoints, and your Pods
are actually serving. At this point, the whole Service proxy mechanism is
suspect. Let’s confirm it, piece by piece.
Confirm that kube-proxy is running on your Nodes. You should get something
like the below:
u@node$ ps auxw | grep kube-proxy
root 4194 0.4 0.1 101864 17696 ? Sl Jul04 25:43 /usr/local/bin/kube-proxy --master=https://kubernetes-master --kubeconfig=/var/lib/kube-proxy/kubeconfig --v=2Next, confirm that it is not failing something obvious, like contacting the
master. To do this, you’ll have to look at the logs. Accessing the logs
depends on your Node OS. On some OSes it is a file, such as
/var/log/kube-proxy.log, while other OSes use journalctl to access logs. You
should see something like:
I1027 22:14:53.995134 5063 server.go:200] Running in resource-only container "/kube-proxy"
I1027 22:14:53.998163 5063 server.go:247] Using iptables Proxier.
I1027 22:14:53.999055 5063 server.go:255] Tearing down userspace rules. Errors here are acceptable.
I1027 22:14:54.038140 5063 proxier.go:352] Setting endpoints for "kube-system/kube-dns:dns-tcp" to [10.244.1.3:53]
I1027 22:14:54.038164 5063 proxier.go:352] Setting endpoints for "kube-system/kube-dns:dns" to [10.244.1.3:53]
I1027 22:14:54.038209 5063 proxier.go:352] Setting endpoints for "default/kubernetes:https" to [10.240.0.2:443]
I1027 22:14:54.038238 5063 proxier.go:429] Not syncing iptables until Services and Endpoints have been received from master
I1027 22:14:54.040048 5063 proxier.go:294] Adding new service "default/kubernetes:https" at 10.0.0.1:443/TCP
I1027 22:14:54.040154 5063 proxier.go:294] Adding new service "kube-system/kube-dns:dns" at 10.0.0.10:53/UDP
I1027 22:14:54.040223 5063 proxier.go:294] Adding new service "kube-system/kube-dns:dns-tcp" at 10.0.0.10:53/TCPIf you see error messages about not being able to contact the master, you
should double-check your Node configuration and installation steps.
One of the possible reasons that kube-proxy cannot run correctly is that the
required conntrack binary cannot be found. This may happen on some Linux
systems, depending on how you are installing the cluster, for example, you are
installing Kubernetes from scratch. If this is the case, you need to manually
install the conntrack package (e.g. sudo apt install conntrack on Ubuntu)
and then retry.
One of the main responsibilities of kube-proxy is to write the iptables
rules which implement Services. Let’s check that those rules are getting
written.
The kube-proxy can run in “userspace” mode, “iptables” mode or “ipvs” mode. Hopefully you are using the “iptables” mode or “ipvs” mode. You should see one of the following cases.
u@node$ iptables-save | grep hostnames
-A KUBE-PORTALS-CONTAINER -d 10.0.1.175/32 -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:default" -m tcp --dport 80 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 48577
-A KUBE-PORTALS-HOST -d 10.0.1.175/32 -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:default" -m tcp --dport 80 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.240.115.247:48577There should be 2 rules for each port on your Service (just one in this
example) - a “KUBE-PORTALS-CONTAINER” and a “KUBE-PORTALS-HOST”. If you do
not see these, try restarting kube-proxy with the -V flag set to 4, and
then look at the logs again.
Almost nobody should be using the “userspace” mode any more, so we won’t spend more time on it here.
u@node$ iptables-save | grep hostnames
-A KUBE-SEP-57KPRZ3JQVENLNBR -s 10.244.3.6/32 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -j MARK --set-xmark 0x00004000/0x00004000
-A KUBE-SEP-57KPRZ3JQVENLNBR -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.244.3.6:9376
-A KUBE-SEP-WNBA2IHDGP2BOBGZ -s 10.244.1.7/32 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -j MARK --set-xmark 0x00004000/0x00004000
-A KUBE-SEP-WNBA2IHDGP2BOBGZ -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.244.1.7:9376
-A KUBE-SEP-X3P2623AGDH6CDF3 -s 10.244.2.3/32 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -j MARK --set-xmark 0x00004000/0x00004000
-A KUBE-SEP-X3P2623AGDH6CDF3 -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -m tcp -j DNAT --to-destination 10.244.2.3:9376
-A KUBE-SERVICES -d 10.0.1.175/32 -p tcp -m comment --comment "default/hostnames: cluster IP" -m tcp --dport 80 -j KUBE-SVC-NWV5X2332I4OT4T3
-A KUBE-SVC-NWV5X2332I4OT4T3 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.33332999982 -j KUBE-SEP-WNBA2IHDGP2BOBGZ
-A KUBE-SVC-NWV5X2332I4OT4T3 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -m statistic --mode random --probability 0.50000000000 -j KUBE-SEP-X3P2623AGDH6CDF3
-A KUBE-SVC-NWV5X2332I4OT4T3 -m comment --comment "default/hostnames:" -j KUBE-SEP-57KPRZ3JQVENLNBRThere should be 1 rule in KUBE-SERVICES, 1 or 2 rules per endpoint in
KUBE-SVC-(hash) (depending on SessionAffinity), one KUBE-SEP-(hash) chain
per endpoint, and a few rules in each KUBE-SEP-(hash) chain. The exact rules
will vary based on your exact config (including node-ports and load-balancers).
u@node$ ipvsadm -ln
Prot LocalAddress:Port Scheduler Flags
-> RemoteAddress:Port Forward Weight ActiveConn InActConn
...
TCP 10.0.1.175:80 rr
-> 10.244.0.5:9376 Masq 1 0 0
-> 10.244.0.6:9376 Masq 1 0 0
-> 10.244.0.7:9376 Masq 1 0 0
...IPVS proxy will create a virtual server for each service address(e.g. Cluster IP, External IP, NodePort IP, Load Balancer IP etc.) and some corresponding real servers for endpoints of the service, if any. In this example, service hostnames(10.0.1.175:80) has 3 endpoints(10.244.0.5:9376, 10.244.0.6:9376, 10.244.0.7:9376) and you’ll get results similar to above.
Assuming you do see the above rules, try again to access your Service by IP:
u@node$ curl 10.0.1.175:80
hostnames-0utonIf this fails and you are using the userspace proxy, you can try accessing the proxy directly. If you are using the iptables proxy, skip this section.
Look back at the iptables-save output above, and extract the
port number that kube-proxy is using for your Service. In the above
examples it is “48577”. Now connect to that:
u@node$ curl localhost:48577
hostnames-yp2kpIf this still fails, look at the kube-proxy logs for specific lines like:
Setting endpoints for default/hostnames:default to [10.244.0.5:9376 10.244.0.6:9376 10.244.0.7:9376]If you don’t see those, try restarting kube-proxy with the -V flag set to 4, and
then look at the logs again.
This can happen when the network is not properly configured for “hairpin”
traffic, usually when kube-proxy is running in iptables mode and Pods
are connected with bridge network. The Kubelet exposes a hairpin-mode
flag that allows endpoints of a Service to loadbalance back to themselves
if they try to access their own Service VIP. The hairpin-mode flag must either be
set to hairpin-veth or promiscuous-bridge.
The common steps to trouble shoot this are as follows:
hairpin-mode is set to hairpin-veth or promiscuous-bridge.
You should see something like the below. hairpin-mode is set to
promiscuous-bridge in the following example.u@node$ ps auxw|grep kubelet
root 3392 1.1 0.8 186804 65208 ? Sl 00:51 11:11 /usr/local/bin/kubelet --enable-debugging-handlers=true --config=/etc/kubernetes/manifests --allow-privileged=True --v=4 --cluster-dns=10.0.0.10 --cluster-domain=cluster.local --configure-cbr0=true --cgroup-root=/ --system-cgroups=/system --hairpin-mode=promiscuous-bridge --runtime-cgroups=/docker-daemon --kubelet-cgroups=/kubelet --babysit-daemons=true --max-pods=110 --serialize-image-pulls=false --outofdisk-transition-frequency=0hairpin-mode. To do this, you’ll have to look at
kubelet log. Accessing the logs depends on your Node OS. On some OSes it
is a file, such as /var/log/kubelet.log, while other OSes use journalctl
to access logs. Please be noted that the effective hairpin mode may not
match --hairpin-mode flag due to compatibility. Check if there is any log
lines with key word hairpin in kubelet.log. There should be log lines
indicating the effective hairpin mode, like something below.I0629 00:51:43.648698 3252 kubelet.go:380] Hairpin mode set to "promiscuous-bridge"hairpin-veth, ensure the Kubelet has
the permission to operate in /sys on node. If everything works properly,
you should see something like:for intf in /sys/devices/virtual/net/cbr0/brif/*; do cat $intf/hairpin_mode; done
1
1
1
1promiscuous-bridge, ensure Kubelet
has the permission to manipulate linux bridge on node. If cbr0` bridge is
used and configured properly, you should see:u@node$ ifconfig cbr0 |grep PROMISC
UP BROADCAST RUNNING PROMISC MULTICAST MTU:1460 Metric:1If you get this far, something very strange is happening. Your Service is
running, has Endpoints, and your Pods are actually serving. You have DNS
working, iptables rules installed, and kube-proxy does not seem to be
misbehaving. And yet your Service is not working. You should probably let
us know, so we can help investigate!
Contact us on Slack or email or GitHub.
Visit troubleshooting document for more information.